What is evidence-based practice in nutrition?
Using best available research evidence to guide nutrition decisions
1/113
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
What is evidence-based practice in nutrition? | Using best available research evidence to guide nutrition decisions |
What is the goal of evidence-based practice? | Develop reliable nutrition recommendations based on research |
Why is evidence-based practice important? | Ensures safe, effective, and scientifically supported care |
What is the hierarchy of evidence? | Ranking of study types based on strength and reliability |
What is the highest level of evidence? | Systematic review and meta-analysis |
What is the gold standard individual study? | Randomized controlled trial (RCT) |
List study types from lowest to highest evidence | Case report → cross-sectional → case-control → cohort → non-randomized trial → RCT → systematic review/meta-analysis |
What are observational studies? | Studies observing associations without intervention |
Examples of observational studies | Case report, cross-sectional, case-control, cohort |
Do observational studies show cause and effect? | No (only associations) |
What is a case report? | Description of one or a few cases without control group |
What is a limitation of case reports? | Low statistical validity |
What are case-control studies? | Compare people with disease to those without (retrospective) |
What is a limitation of case-control studies? | Recall bias and no causation |
What are cross-sectional studies? | Data collected at one time point |
What is a limitation? | No cause-effect relationship |
What are cohort studies? | Follow exposed vs non-exposed groups over time |
What is strength of cohort studies? | Show temporal relationships |
What is limitation? | Confounding variables; no causation |
What are intervention studies? | Studies that introduce a treatment or exposure |
What is an RCT? | Randomized study comparing intervention vs control |
Why are RCTs strong? | Reduce bias and show cause-effect |
What is a non-randomized trial? | Intervention study without randomization |
What is limitation? | Less robust than RCT |
What is a systematic review? | Summary of multiple studies answering a focused question |
What is a meta-analysis? | Statistical combination of results from multiple studies |
Why are meta-analyses powerful? | Increase sample size and statistical power |
What are in vitro studies? | Cell/tissue studies in lab |
What is limitation of in vitro studies? | Low generalizability |
What are animal studies? | Studies in living organisms (non-human) |
What are advantages? | Controlled, mechanism testing |
What is limitation? | Less generalizable to humans |
What are behavioral studies? | Test interventions in real-world settings |
What is robustness (R)? | Strength and control of study design |
What is generalizability (G)? | Ability to apply results to real population |
What is the main trade-off in research? | High control (R) vs real-world applicability (G) |
What factors should be considered when evaluating evidence? | Study type, population, methods, results, bias, limitations |
What population factors matter in studies? | Sample size, inclusion/exclusion criteria |
What methodological factors matter? | Randomization, blinding, control groups |
What is bias? | Systematic error affecting study validity |
What is selection bias? | Improper randomization or group selection |
What is performance bias? | Differences in treatment exposure |
What is detection bias? | Differences in outcome assessment |
What is attrition bias? | Dropouts affecting results |
What is reporting bias? | Selective reporting of outcomes |
What is financial bias? | Funding influencing results |
What tool is used to assess bias? | Cochrane Collaboration tool |
What is PEN? | Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition (resource by Dietitians of Canada) |
What does PEN provide? | Evidence-based recommendations for dietitians |
What are PEN evidence grades? | A, B, C, D |
What does grade A mean? | Good evidence |
What does grade B mean? | Fair evidence |
What does grade C mean? | Limited evidence |
What does grade D mean? | Very limited or conflicting evidence |
What is an example of applying evidence? | Egg intake and CVD risk in diabetes |
What did RCT evidence show for egg intake? | No adverse effect on major CVD risk factors |
What was limitation of egg studies? | Few studies and small sample sizes |
Why must results be interpreted carefully? | Limited generalizability and study design differences |
What is an important step in evidence-based practice? | Critically evaluate research before applying |
What is a major issue in nutrition research? | Conflicting recommendations |
Why do conflicting recommendations occur? | Different study types, bias, and interpretation |
What is the main takeaway about evidence-based recommendations? | They take time and evolve with new research |
What is a key controversy example? | Seven Countries Study |
What was criticism of the Seven Countries Study? | Data selection bias (“cherry-picking”) |
What is a key lesson from research controversies? | Always critically evaluate evidence and bias |
Why has trust in nutrition research been affected? | Conflicting findings and bias concerns |
What is a modern approach to evidence? | More strict evaluation and bias control |
What is a limitation of being too strict? | May exclude useful studies |