At the end of our reading, the author (Pojman) argues that literature is a good substitute for philosophical analysis.
(a) True
(b) False
false
1/10
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
At the end of our reading, the author (Pojman) argues that literature is a good substitute for philosophical analysis.
(a) True
(b) False | false |
Briefly summarize what Pojman says about literature.
| litautre is the best source of moral cases studies |
There are many ways to study morality.
(a) True
(b) False | true |
What does ‘normative’ mean?
| standard theory |
How are moral norms different from other norms?
| moral norms are about right or wrong other norms or styles of preferences |
Moral reasoning is a mechanical process cut off from emotion.
(a) True
(b) False | false |
Only through __________ can we rise above feelings and see clearly.
(a) Moving inspiration
(b) Critical thinking
(c) Persuasive speaking
(d) Broad agreement
(e) None of the above | critical thinking |
Morality is both personal and social.
(a) True
(b) False | true |
Two kinds of moral norms: obligation and __________.
(a) Truth
(b) Hope
(c) Justice
(d) Value
(e) None of the above | value |
Good people can do wrong, bad people can do right — what does this suggest?
| morality is about action not the person |