Exam 3
Created by Alexis Unger
Stereotypes
Cognitive beliefs about characteristics of a group. Example: "women are more emotional," "Engineers are socially awkward"
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
Stereotypes | Cognitive beliefs about characteristics of a group. Example: "women are more emotional," "Engineers are socially awkward" |
Discrimination | Behavioral actions toward a group based on group membership. Example: not hiring someone because of their age |
Social Groups | Categories of people who share a common identity. Example: racial groups, political groups, sports teams, religious groups |
BIRG (Basking in Reflected Glory) | Associating yourself with successful ingroup members. Example: saying "we won!" when your school's team wins |
CORF (Cutting Off Reflected Failure) | Distancing yourself from an ingroup after failure. example: "they lost", when your team performs poorly |
Ingroup Favoritism | Preferential treatment toward one's own group. Example: grading essays more leniently when you think the writer is from your university |
Outgroup Homogeneity Effect | Perceiving outgroup members as "all the same". Example: "All sorority girls are identical" |
Why does outgroup homogeneity occur? | Less exposure to outgroup variability, cognitive efficiency (easier to simplify), motivational need to see ingroup as unique and superior |
(A class divided) Blue-eyed vs. Brown- eyed groups showed: | Ingroup favoritism: children favored their assigned "superior" group
Outgroup favoritism: children treated the "inferior" group worse
Rapid Internalization: performance changed based on group status |
Negative stereotypes | lower performance, increased anxiety, biased judgements. Example: "Black students are less academically capable" |
Positive stereotypes | still harmful because they create pressure, reduce individuality, lead to backlash when violated. Example: "Asians are naturally good at math" |
Are stereotypes accurate? | Some contain a "kernel of truth" but they are overgeneralized, exaggerated, and poor predictors of individuals. They ignore within-group variability. |
Illusory Correlation | Perceiving a relationship between two variables when none exists |
Why Illusory Correlation | attention to distinctive events, confirmation bias, cognitive shortcuts |
Stereotypes affect... | Interpretations: ambiguous behavior seen as stereotype-consistent
judgements: harsher evaluations
behavior: self-fulfilling prophecies, discriminatory actions |
Moral exclusion | Viewing certain groups as outside the boundary of moral concern. Example: believing homeless people "don't deserve help" or treating prisoners as less human |
Stereotype threat | fear of confirming a stereotype about one's group-> impaired performance. Examples: women performing worse on math tests when gender is highlighted |
Reducing stereotype threat: | reframing the task, emphasizing growth mindset, role models, self-affirmation, reducing identity salience |
Unprejudiced | not the absence of stereotypes: actively correcting for them, being motivated to treat people fairly, using controlled processing to override automatic biases |
Contact Hypothesis | reduces prejudice when
1. equal status
2. common goals
3. cooperation
4. institutional support
5. personal interaction |
Why contact sometimes fails | Subtyping: "they're an exception"
Compartmentalization: "this person is different from the group"
Contrast effects: "They're not like the typical group member |
Robber's Cave Study | -boys split into groups -> hostility developed
-mere contact did not reduce conflict
-superordinate goals (shared goals requiring cooperation) reduced prejudice |
Superordinate goals | -fixing a broken water supply
-completing a group project
-disaster relief efforts |
Individual mobility | Leaving the group to improve status. Example: changing schools to escape a low-status identity |
Social Creativity | Changing the comparison dimension. Example: "we're not rich, but we're more community-oriented" |
Social Change | Collective action to improve group status. Example: Civil rights movements |
Aggression | behavior intended to harm another |
Hostile aggression | driven by anger. Example: punching someone in a fight |
Instrumental aggression | harm as a means to an end. Example: tackling someone in football |
Physical aggression | bodily harm |
Relational aggression | damaging relationships. Example: gossip, exclusion |
Verbal aggression | insults, threats |
Conflict | Percieved incompatibility of goals. Example: two coworkers competing for a promotion |
General Aggression Model (GAM) | Aggression results from:
Insults: person factors (traits, attitudes), situational factors (provocation, heat)
Routes: affect, arousal, cognition
Outcomes: appraisal -> behavior |
Rewards | reinforcement increases aggression. Example: a child gets what they want after hitting -> more hitting |
Culture of Honor | Cultures where reputation must be defended.
- more violent retaliation
- more honor-related crimes (assaults, homicides) |
Gender differences | Men: more physical aggression
Women: more relational aggression |
Frustration- Aggression Theory | Blocked goals -> frustration -> aggression
. Example: road rage when stuck in traffic |
Modeling Aggression (Bandura) Bobo Doll Study | Children who saw an adult behave aggressively:
- imitated aggression
- invented new aggressive acts
- nonaggressive models reduced aggression |
Learned Aggressive Stimuli | Objects associated with aggression increase aggression. Example: presence of a gun increases aggressive responses |
Superficial vs. Systematic Processing | When cognitive resources are low -> superficial processing -> more aggression |
Two things that reduce deep processing | - alcohol
- cognitive load (stress, multitasking) |
Realistic Conflict Theory | competition for limited resources -> conflict. Example: job competition between groups |
Relative Deprivation | feeling deprived compared to others
- Egoistic: "I am deprived"
- Fraternal: "my group is deprived" |
Reducing Aggression | - remove aggressive cues
- model nonaggression
- teach communication skills
- increase empathy
- punishment only works when immediate, consistent, and fair |
Prosocial behavior vs. Cooperation | Prosocial Behavior: helping others
Cooperation: working together toward mutual benefit |
Perceiving need | People help when they notice need, rural areas help more due to lower overload |
Time Pressure | less time -> less helping. Good Samaritan study: seminarians in a hurry helped less |
Social responsibility norm | Help those who depend on us. Controllability matters: people help more when the need is uncontrollable |
Bystander effect | More bystanders -> less helping |
Norms | family privacy norm reduces helping in domestic disputes. |
Egoism | helping for self- benefit |
Altruism | helping for other's benefit |
Evolutionary Perspective | evolved through: kin selection, reciprocal altruism, group survival advantages |
Rewards & Costs | People help when rewards > cost
Good mood -> more helping
Bad mood -> more helping if helping relieves guilt |
Negative-State Relief | Help to reduce own negative feelings |
Empathy- Altruism | High empathy -> help regardless of personal cost |
Increasing Helping & Reducing Bystander Effect | - Reduce ambiguity ("I need help!")
- Assign responsibility ("You in the blue shirt- call 911")
- Increase empathy
- Model helping
- Teach about bystander effect |
Just-world belief | belief that the world is just, so people deserve what they get/get what they deserve |