Delegation
the transfer of responsibility for specific tasks from one level to a lower one. delegate is still responsible for outcome.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
Delegation | the transfer of responsibility for specific tasks from one level to a lower one. delegate is still responsible for outcome. |
Span of control | Number of subordinates over whom a manager or supervisor has direct control.
Wide: more delegation, reduces supervision, better job enrichment
Narrow: tighter supervision, less chance of mistake. |
Levels of hierarchy | to the number f layers of authority within a business.
Tall: many levels, narrow span of control. (top-down)
Flat: few levels, wide span of control. (top-down and bottom-up) |
Chain of command | line of authority and responsibility along which orders are passed from one person to another. ensures efficiency and effective decision-making. |
Bureaucracy | a system of administration with clear hierarchal structure in which people are expected to follow precisely defined rules and procedures. |
Centralization | where only one individual or small group of top managers makes decision about the company's direction |
Decentralization | gives authority for decision making to employees lower down on the organizational structure. |
Delayering | reducing the number of levels in the organizational hierarchy
helps improve efficiency by improving communication
ADV: reduction in wages
DIS: job losses, decreased motivation, loss of knowledge from fired employees |
Matrix structure | a structure where team members report to multiple managers, they report to a project manager and department manager |
Tall organizational structure adv/dis | ADV: authority is establishes, promotion is available and motivating, junior employees receive more support from managers
DIS: responds slowly to change, communication is slow, can increase labor costs |
Flat organizational structure adv/dis | ADV: delegation can allow employees a variety of jobs, motivation and productivity are high, keeps labor costs lower
DIS: managers may be overworked with many junior employees, high training costs |
Organizational Structure by product | the business is organized into departments or division. each department focuses on a different product.
ADV: clear focus on marker segment to meet customer needs. Positive competition between divisions. Better control as each division acts as separate profit centre
DIS: duplicate of funtions. Negative effects of competition on quality. Lack of central control over each division which may dilute the brand |
Organizational Structure by function | the organization is divided into smaller groups based on specialized functional areas, such as marketing, finance, ect.
ADV: specialization, accountability, clarity
DIS: closed communication -> lack of focus. Departments can become resistant to change. Coordination may take too long |
Organizational structure by region | when operations are in different geographical locations
ADV: serve local needs better, positive competition, more effective communication between firms and customers
DIS: conflict between local and central management. Duplication of resources and functions |
Project based organizations | activities are carried out by temporary teams who are assembled for a specific project.
|