Leadership and Management - 2.3
Created by Lujain Hennawi
Management
The coordination and organization of business activities, people, and resources to achieve their aims
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
Management | The coordination and organization of business activities, people, and resources to achieve their aims |
Functions of Management | Commanding: giving instructions to workers to achieve objectives
Coordinating: communicating amongst departments to ensure optimal function as a whole
Controlling: ensuring high quality performance and completion of tasks
Planning: developing a formal action plan to achieve objective
Organizing: |
Leadership | Ability of an individual or group to influence and guide members of an organization. In other words, it is the process if social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others, towards the achievement of a goal |
Scientific Thinking and Management | Management and decision making that is focused on objectivity, facts, and evidence |
Intuitive Thinking and Management | Decision making that is based on personal beliefs, instincts, or gut feelings. |
Autocratic Leadership | When managers keep control of information and decision making at the top of the organization
Features: leader makes all decisions, gives little information to staff, supervises workers closely |
Application of Autocratic Leadership | Good for:
- Quick decision making- time of crisis or emergency
- Military/police where danger is possible
- Important decisions need to be communicated in difficult times
- Managing many unskilled workers
Not Good for:
- Highly complex decisions where lots of input is needed
- Leading talented, motivated, and creative employees
- Junior leaders need to develop leadership skills |
Paternalistic Leadership | Takes into account the interests of the workers when making decisions. They will consult employees on decisions but remain the sole decision maker.
Main features: leader makes all the decisions, Minimal delegation, Considers employees “family' , Does not encourage creativity or initiative |
Application of Paternalistic Leadership | Good for:
- Family run businesses with a few employees
- Can reduce staff turnover because of the “familial environment”
Not good for:
- Low staff motivation if loyal connection to leader is not established
- Increasing dependency of employees on the leader, leading to more supervision required
- Employee dissatisfaction if bad decisions are made |
Democratic Leaderhsip | Based on decisions that are agreed upon by the majority of employees. It is also called participative leadership. This is usually done informally, but some businesses may hold votes to make major decisions.
Main features: leaders delegate a lot, Participation is highly encouraged, Leader explains reasoning for decision making, Employees have more control over their jobs, Requires very good communication |
Application of Democratic Leadership
| Good for:
- Low dependency on the leader is needed
- High motivation and job satisfaction
- Creative and skilled workforce
NOT Good for:
- Consultation with staff can be time consuming
- Level of involvement - some issues might be too sensitive, e.g. job losses, sensitive information, development of new products etc.
|
Laissez-faire Leadership | Occurs when leaders allow employees to make all of their own decisions. First reason, the leader is not very skilled and allows workers to do what they want. Second reason, when the leader trusts employees and allows them complete freedom
Main features: Good for highly creative or technical fields, Communication is usually between people on the same level, Organization/department can lack focus
|
Application of Laissez-faire Leadership
| Good for:
- Creative and skilled workforce that need no supervision
- Leader is an equal in terms of experience and knowledge
- Employees understand organizational objectives
NOT Good for:
- Motivation as workers can be confused and not know what to do
- Organizations that need more structure and direction for leaders
|
Situational Leadership | Occurs when a leader adjusts their style to a particular task, situation, set of employees, etc. This means that they can act different ways when needed. The characteristics of the other leadership types are used when necessary. But can cause confusion for workers. |