Working Memory

Created by Axel Burch

working memory
the ability to keep small amounts of information readily available for our current activities

1/23

TermDefinition
working memory
the ability to keep small amounts of information readily available for our current activities
working memory model
CE -> VSS (visual cache and inner scribe) and PL (phonological store and articulatory rehearsal process) ->EB -> LTM
aim of WMM
to give an economical and coherent account of a range of data
dual task evidence for WMM
>primary task (focus) and secondary task >if separate mental mechanisms are used (multiple areas of WM) then no interference should occur >if the same mental mechanisms are used (1 area of WMM) then interference should occur
evaluation of WMM stores
>Morey- separate STM and verbal STM stores are unnecessary as higher costs found in tasks overseen by separate memory stores >Baddeley- argument not valid as additional executive costs occur during dual tasking
PL evidence
>phonological similarity effect >articulatory suppression >word length effect
phonological similarity effect (Conrad, 1964)
tendency for immediate serial recall of verbal material to be reduced when items are similar in sound
articulatory suppression
preventing articulatory rehearsal affects retention as both similar and dissimilar words will be retained at a lower but equivalent level
articulatory suppression evidence (Baddeley)
>read two word lists aloud and memorise them >words are shorter in second list so it should be easier to remember >preventing articulatory rehearsal removes word length effect
word length effect
a tendency for verbal memory span to decrease when longer words are used
visual cache of VSS
passive storage of information about form and colour
inner scribe of VSS
active system dealing with spatial locations of objects and movement, and refreshes visual cache contents
corsi block primary task
measures spatial memory by repeating a sequence of locations on the blocks until failure
visual patterns primary task
measure visual span with increasingly complex matrix patterns which participants reproduce until failure
spatial tapping secondary task
disrupts spatial memory by occupying inner scribe through tapping a set of targets
irrelevant pictures secondary task
disrupts visual memory by occupying visual cache through showing irrelevant abstract images
behavioural double dissociation
>Della Sala et al. >dual task interference paradigm >components within the VSS can be disrupted by dual tasking so there may be further subdivisions or a better explanation
episodic buffer
later added in 2000, and has a capacity of 3-5 chunks and binds (chunks) information from the WMM so it can be integrated with LTM
change detection paradigm
>Luck and Vogal- sample array and test array presented, with 50% of trial showing identical displays, then participants indicate whether arrays are identical or not >articulatory suppression used to ensure visual processing
capacity
>defined by objects not features
evidence of capacity
>Luck and Vogal- presented objects defined by mixture of colour, orientation, size and presence/absence of a gap so that 24 features were distributed across 6 objects >16 features across 4 objects retained as easily as 4 features across 4 objects
evaluation of capacity
>Oberauer and Eichenberger >visual memory limited on dimensions: no. objects, no. feature per object, and precision of memory for each feature
attentional resources of binding
>dual tasking tests >surface-feature binding (colour and shape) immune to concurrent load (counting backwards) in some literature but requires attention in other, so may occur automatically in early perceptual processes >location binding disrupted by concurrent load