Alexander 05 Sources for Alexander
Created by Mr GXD
What is a major strength of using literary sources like Arrian and Plutarch?
They provide detailed narratives and insights into Alexander's intentions and character
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
What is a major strength of using literary sources like Arrian and Plutarch? | They provide detailed narratives and insights into Alexander's intentions and character |
What is a significant weakness of the literary sources provided in the course? | They were all written centuries after the events they describe |
What is a primary strength of archaeological sources like the Babylonian Diary? | They are often contemporary (produced at the time) and provide a non-Greek perspective |
What is a major weakness of archaeological evidence compared to literary texts? | They offer limited narrative detail and cannot explain the 'why' behind events as well as texts |
Why is Arrian considered a 'pro' source for military history? | He had personal military experience as a Roman governor and cavalry officer |
What is a weakness of Plutarch's biographical approach? | He was a moralist who prioritized anecdotes and character sketches over strict historical fact |
What is a strength of using ancient coins (tetradrachms) as evidence? | They show how Alexander or his successors wanted to project his image and divine status |
What is a weakness of the Alexander Mosaic from Pompeii? | It is a Roman copy of a painting and may prioritize artistic glorification over accuracy |
What strength does the use of 'lost' sources like Ptolemy give to later writers? | Later authors like Arrian had access to eyewitness accounts and court journals that no longer exist |
What is a weakness regarding the figures provided in literary sources? | Ancient authors often exaggerated numbers, such as Persian army sizes or enemy casualties |
What is a strength of Diodorus Siculus's account of Philip II? | He is our main source for the details and motives surrounding Philip II's assassination |
What is a weakness of the 'Western' literary tradition in these sources? | They are written from a Romanized/Greek perspective, often lacking a Persian viewpoint |
How is the Alexander Sarcophagus a strength for military historians? | It provides visual evidence of the weaponry and armor (like the lion skin) used in battle |
What is a weakness of using the Sarcophagus as definitive evidence? | The identities of the figures are debated, and it was likely commissioned for a Persian noble, not Alexander |
What is a strength of the Babylonian Astronomical Diary? | It records specific dates and omens (like eclipses) that help verify the timing of Gaugamela |
What is a weakness of Arrian's writing style? | He explicitly states his admiration for Alexander, which may result in a biased glorification of his deeds |
How do literary sources help with geography (a 'pro')? | They describe the route of the campaign and the founding of specific cities like Alexandria |
What is a weakness of the anecdotal 'direct speech' found in Plutarch? | It is unlikely to be a verbatim record, as Plutarch wrote centuries after the speeches were given |
What strength does material evidence provide regarding religion? | Items like the Lysimachus coin prove the importance of Zeus Ammon and Alexander's deification |
What is a final weakness mentioned about the literary sources provided? | There are no surviving Persian accounts to balance the Greek/Roman narrative |