Columbus Zoo Case
Former executives misused Zoo funds for personal benefit, including vacations, vehicles, sporting events, and other expenses
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
Columbus Zoo Case | Former executives misused Zoo funds for personal benefit, including vacations, vehicles, sporting events, and other expenses |
How much was involved in the Columbus Zoo case and how long did it last? | It involved over $2.3 million and lasted from 2011–2021 (10 years) |
How was the Columbus Zoo case uncovered? | A forensic audit helped uncover the fraud |
Types of Damages in Litigation | Economic Damages
Non-economic damages
Punitive damages |
Economic damages | Money a person or business lost because of someone else’s actions |
Non-economic damages | Non-financial losses that are harder to put a dollar amount on (pain & suffering) |
Punitive damages | Money paid by the defendant to the plaintiff as punishment for especially wrongful conduct |
Types of Economic Damages | Benefit of the Bargain (expectation damages)
Reliance |
Lost profits calculation | Lost revenue minus avoided costs |
Lost Profits componenets | Lost revenues
Incremental costs
Loss period |
Types of Monetary remedies | Unjust Enrichment
Double-counting of expectation damages & unjust enrichment |
Unjust Enrichment | Returning money or profits someone unfairly gained |
Double-counting of expectation damages & unjust enrichment | You can't get paid twice for the same loss |
4 Lost revenue methodologies | Before-and-after method
Yardstick or Benchmark method
Contract-based Method
Market-share Approach |
Before-and-after method | Compare what the business made before vs. after the event to calculate the loss |
Yardstick or Benchmark method | Use a similar unaffected business as a “yardstick” to estimate what the plaintiff would have earned |
Contract-based Method | Use the contract to determine how much revenue the plaintiff should have received |
Market-share Approach | Estimate lost revenue based on the share of the market the business would have captured |
Considerations in computing damages | Budgeted or expected performance
Changes in business model
Condition of economy
Performance of similar businesses or locations
Performance in client company's industry |
Causation | Proving that the defendant’s actions caused the financial loss |
Reasonable Certainty | Damages must be based on solid evidence, not just an estimate or guess |
Proving Causation steps | 1. Plaintiff must prove defendant committed a wrongful act
2. Plaintiff must prove they experienced economic harm
3. Plaintiff must prove defendant's wrongful act was proximate cause of their damages |
Proximate Cause | The defendant’s actions directly and foreseeably caused the financial loss |
What can a forensics' acct do to prove reasonable certainty? | If client provides:
-financial projections
-assumed growth rates
-select market information
then it can determine if its reasonable |
Discounting Economic damages by using... | Time Value of Money
|
Time value of money equation | FV/[(1+Discount rate)^periods] |
choosing right discount rate | defined rate by agreement
rated identifies by court
risk-free rate of return
rate based on specific investment |