Seminars
Created by Axel Burch
lexical decision task
(Rubenstein, Garfield and Millikan)
>present string of letters
>some are words, some are non-sense strings of letters
>press button to indicate whether letters are a word or non-sense
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
lexical decision task | (Rubenstein, Garfield and Millikan)
>present string of letters
>some are words, some are non-sense strings of letters
>press button to indicate whether letters are a word or non-sense |
using LDT to explore concepts | >development and learning
>emotions
>acquired impairments
>personality |
lexical decision task hypotheses | >speed of identification dependent on word frequency
>dependent on age of learning e.g. later AoA linked to slower identification |
age of acquisition | >Carroll and White- impacts adult word processing times
>early acquired words may act as semantic hubs so have a more central place within a semantic network
>could be explained by greater neural plasticity during early language acquisition |
word length hypothesis | length of words influences reaction time in LDTs |
processing speed hypothesis | longer words require more time to process due to larger visual and cognitive load |
parallel processing models | some aspect of word recognition occur simultaneously, reducing the impact of word length |
interactive activation models of word recognition | weaker word length effects due to simultaneous processing letter-level and word-level information |
connectionist models of word recognition | longer word require more cycles of activation, supporting graded impact of word length |
dual-route cascaded model of word recognition | differentiates between lexical sub-lexical processing, explaining why length effects vary based of word familiarity |
automacity | more automatic reading processes reduce word length effect |
cognitive load | longer word increase cognitive load, revealing how limited-capacity systems manage complex stimuli |
selective attention theory for the stroop effect | selective attention chooses which stimuli is granted further processing and awareness, so in a Stroop task written information is processed over the colour |
automaticity theory for the stroop effect | reading words is more of an automated process than recognising colour |
speed of processing theory | process written words faster than processing colour so its harder to identify the colour |
parallel distributed theory for the stroop effect | different pathways created for different tasks, and the strength of the pathway affects which aspect is easier to identify |
phonological deficit hypothesis of dyslexia | caused by cognitive deficit specific to representations and processing of speech sounds |
rapid automatic naming task | >strongly correlated with reading ability
>predicts future reading ability
>used in literacy screening |