Seminars

Created by Axel Burch

lexical decision task
(Rubenstein, Garfield and Millikan) >present string of letters >some are words, some are non-sense strings of letters >press button to indicate whether letters are a word or non-sense

1/18

TermDefinition
lexical decision task
(Rubenstein, Garfield and Millikan) >present string of letters >some are words, some are non-sense strings of letters >press button to indicate whether letters are a word or non-sense
using LDT to explore concepts
>development and learning >emotions >acquired impairments >personality
lexical decision task hypotheses
>speed of identification dependent on word frequency >dependent on age of learning e.g. later AoA linked to slower identification
age of acquisition
>Carroll and White- impacts adult word processing times >early acquired words may act as semantic hubs so have a more central place within a semantic network >could be explained by greater neural plasticity during early language acquisition
word length hypothesis
length of words influences reaction time in LDTs
processing speed hypothesis
longer words require more time to process due to larger visual and cognitive load
parallel processing models
some aspect of word recognition occur simultaneously, reducing the impact of word length
interactive activation models of word recognition
weaker word length effects due to simultaneous processing letter-level and word-level information
connectionist models of word recognition
longer word require more cycles of activation, supporting graded impact of word length
dual-route cascaded model of word recognition
differentiates between lexical sub-lexical processing, explaining why length effects vary based of word familiarity
automacity
more automatic reading processes reduce word length effect
cognitive load
longer word increase cognitive load, revealing how limited-capacity systems manage complex stimuli
selective attention theory for the stroop effect
selective attention chooses which stimuli is granted further processing and awareness, so in a Stroop task written information is processed over the colour
automaticity theory for the stroop effect
reading words is more of an automated process than recognising colour
speed of processing theory
process written words faster than processing colour so its harder to identify the colour
parallel distributed theory for the stroop effect
different pathways created for different tasks, and the strength of the pathway affects which aspect is easier to identify
phonological deficit hypothesis of dyslexia
caused by cognitive deficit specific to representations and processing of speech sounds
rapid automatic naming task
>strongly correlated with reading ability >predicts future reading ability >used in literacy screening