Meta Ethics Pt.2 and post modernism
Created by Yakira deRouen
what distinguishes Meta-Ethics from the other ethics we have been covering in class?
investigates fundamental nature, meaning, and justification of moral concepts rather than specific moral rule
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
what distinguishes Meta-Ethics from the other ethics we have been covering in class? | investigates fundamental nature, meaning, and justification of moral concepts rather than specific moral rule |
relativism | knowledge, truth, and morality exist only in relation to culture. no universal truths |
edmund husserl wanted to study humans and their experiences to look for what is universal in how humans view the world. what was his branch called? | Phenomenology |
subjectivism | knowledge is personal reference or choice. no universal truths |
what is objectivism in ethics? according to postmodernists do objective truths exist? | the belief that there are objective truths or final truth for everything, while postmodernists disagree |
how does bracketing challenge the possibility of objective ethical judgments, given that human experience and moral reasoning are shaped by cultural and historical context? | bracketing shows how our thinking is shaped by our own experiences, identity, and culture, giving us a Lense, making it difficult to make a fully objective ethical judgment |
what did deconstructionists ass to this conversation? | by taking apart the idea and understanding where it came from |
what was Nietzsche exploring in his book "On Genealogy of Morals"? | where morals come from, showing they are shaped by culture and experience, not universal truth |
what did critical theory add to this conversation? | questioning why some ideas continue to exist |
how did Nietzsche think Christianity morality was shaped | shaped by people background and experiences, especially as a reaction to roman strength and power |
how did American pragmatists Richard rorty try to solve the problem of which ideas work? | said the idea may be good if they help people solve problems and live a better life, while pragmatists asked if this actually worked in real life. |
in also sprach zarathustra, characters call us to overcome inherited moral systems and create new values. did he think many could do this? what did he call those who could? | no he did not believe many are capable of this. those who were are called Übermensch |
what are the strengths of postmodernism | understanding where certain ideas came from, while also being able to set up a framework that works for everyone |
what are the challenges of post modernism | understanding truth, as well as coherence |
according to Sartre, what are the two types of things that exist in this world? where did he put humans? | essence perceives existence, and existence perceives essence. humans are existence perceiving essence |
mary midgley says postmodernism has a coherence problem, meaning? | she explained the problem of coherence because it explains there are no objective truths, while treating the idea as an objective truth |
what does Sartre mean by "existence perceiving essence" and how does this ground his view of human freedom, responsibility, and demand for authenticity? | he explained there is no rule book on how to be human, and you can choose your own morals and values |
define bad faith | to accept labels put on you by others |
what is an existential hero | a person who is authentic to them selves |