Meta Ethics Pt.2 and post modernism

Created by Yakira deRouen

what distinguishes Meta-Ethics from the other ethics we have been covering in class?
investigates fundamental nature, meaning, and justification of moral concepts rather than specific moral rule

1/19

TermDefinition
what distinguishes Meta-Ethics from the other ethics we have been covering in class?
investigates fundamental nature, meaning, and justification of moral concepts rather than specific moral rule
relativism
knowledge, truth, and morality exist only in relation to culture. no universal truths
edmund husserl wanted to study humans and their experiences to look for what is universal in how humans view the world. what was his branch called?
Phenomenology
subjectivism
knowledge is personal reference or choice. no universal truths
what is objectivism in ethics? according to postmodernists do objective truths exist?
the belief that there are objective truths or final truth for everything, while postmodernists disagree
how does bracketing challenge the possibility of objective ethical judgments, given that human experience and moral reasoning are shaped by cultural and historical context?
bracketing shows how our thinking is shaped by our own experiences, identity, and culture, giving us a Lense, making it difficult to make a fully objective ethical judgment
what did deconstructionists ass to this conversation?
by taking apart the idea and understanding where it came from
what was Nietzsche exploring in his book "On Genealogy of Morals"?
where morals come from, showing they are shaped by culture and experience, not universal truth
what did critical theory add to this conversation?
questioning why some ideas continue to exist
how did Nietzsche think Christianity morality was shaped
shaped by people background and experiences, especially as a reaction to roman strength and power
how did American pragmatists Richard rorty try to solve the problem of which ideas work?
said the idea may be good if they help people solve problems and live a better life, while pragmatists asked if this actually worked in real life.
in also sprach zarathustra, characters call us to overcome inherited moral systems and create new values. did he think many could do this? what did he call those who could?
no he did not believe many are capable of this. those who were are called Übermensch
what are the strengths of postmodernism
understanding where certain ideas came from, while also being able to set up a framework that works for everyone
what are the challenges of post modernism
understanding truth, as well as coherence
according to Sartre, what are the two types of things that exist in this world? where did he put humans?
essence perceives existence, and existence perceives essence. humans are existence perceiving essence
mary midgley says postmodernism has a coherence problem, meaning?
she explained the problem of coherence because it explains there are no objective truths, while treating the idea as an objective truth
what does Sartre mean by "existence perceiving essence" and how does this ground his view of human freedom, responsibility, and demand for authenticity?
he explained there is no rule book on how to be human, and you can choose your own morals and values
define bad faith
to accept labels put on you by others
what is an existential hero
a person who is authentic to them selves